
It started all chirpy: Firefighters are better equipped and prepared than ever before.
The project to deliver new FireControl centres that will answer 999 calls to the Fire and Rescue Service and improve public and firefighter safety should continue, according to a Parliamentary Select Committee report published today.
The report concerned FireControl – the Government plan to save loads of cash by closing the UK’s 47 county based fire service centres and replacing them with nine regional ones.
Yet DCLG have taken the one thing that could possibly have been twisted in their favour from this report – that it said the project should continue – and utterly warped it into a positive story.

In fact, it was such a hideous, abomination of a financial fiasco, the report says, that it would now be more expensive to scrap it than to continue.
The report said the scheme was costing DCLG £423 million, more than triple the original price tag, and that forecasted savings had fallen by around two-thirds.
Rather than save cash overall as first expected, FireControl is now predicted to saddle the taxpayer with a £240 million loss.
In fact, the cost to the taxpayer of this mega-botch could be up to £1.4 billion – because DCLG is already having to lease the new regional centre buildings even though they’re not in use.

Here is the real killer – the report claimed DCLG officials tried to withhold documents from the inquiry in a bid to hide their incompetence.
No surprise, I suppose, after seeing the mendacious press release they put out.
For moment I thougt this an April spoof. Then I realised since this Government and Labour .....
ReplyDeleteWell spotted.I took the time to find and read the Select Committee report. It's findings are scandalous.
ReplyDeleteThe press release is an outrageous deceit and is giving spin a bad name.
So much for restoring trust.
It's a disgrace, and knowing what's happened to the Ambulance response times since their control centres were 'centralised' it doesn't bode well for those needing a fire engine.
ReplyDelete