
Lobbydog was chatting to the National Executive Committee’s Peter Kenyon who said it would be outrageous if the pair took up their so-called “resettlement grants”.
Hoon stands to walk away with £64,000 and Hewitt, £54,000, under the grant system, which was set up to help MPs “adjust to non-parliamentary life”.
Kenyon said: “I think there is a case for any member of any party that doesn’t have a genuine need, to voluntarily forgo the grant. That seems to be the incontrovertible case.
“For an MP that is stepping down at the next election that already has employment or the means of surviving promptly it would be outrageous for them to claim it, particularly in the light of how the public now sees MPs.
“If it requires intervention to that end from the Parliamentary Standards Authority, then I would whole heartedly support that.”
It’s all the more scandalous of course because neither Hoon, a trained lawyer with a property portfolio, nor Hewitt, who holds board level positions with Boots, BT, Cinven and Barclays Capital, is in a tight spot financially now that they’re leaving the House.

LD spoke to the pair yesterday, both said they had “not given much thought” as to whether they would take the grant or not.
'Not much though'? That'll be as much thought as my family give to their stomachs, which is more or less constantly.
ReplyDeleteId love to be in a position where Id give "not much thought" to over £50,000.
ReplyDeleteThere should be no redundancy money for people who volutarily leave their jobs. There isn't anywhere else. If I decide to pack up tomorrow no one is going to give me a redundancy payment to help me adjust.
The job centre will say that I shold not have given up my job and disallow me benefit.
Talok about one deal for them and one for ordinary people.
How I wish I were as "extraordinary" as they are.