Wednesday 12 January 2011

Fraudsters get the vote

Figures have been published this morning showing just how many different types of prisoner would have got the vote last year had the new electoral rules, announced by Justice Secretary Ken Clarke, been in place.

Under the proposals prisoners serving up to four years in prison will be able to vote in general elections by proxy or by post in their normal constituency of residence.

Some of the stats were mentioned in the House yesterday but seeing them all brings the issue into stark focus.

The figures show 1,742 sex offenders, 2,484 robbers, 4,144 burglars, 3,484 thieves, 1,060 fraudsters, 4,306 drug offenders and over 5,000 other more minor offenders would have all got a say in who runs the country.

In total 28,770 prisoners would have been able to vote under the new rules – a new focus group for the party strategists to account for.


Anonymous said...

Its a daft ruling from the ECHR.

But all these miscreants will have the vote once released. The fact that they are undesirable is not a valid reason for denying them the vote. There are lots of undesirables at liberty who do not deserve the right to vote.

The valid reason that they be denied the vote is that we chose to deny them their freedom for their crimes and include the vote in that.
Thats valid - its our business.

william said...

"GOSSIP, OPINION AND WESTMINSTER TALES" offers an engaging and candid peek into the activities of Nottinghamshire's MPs. The book's inside track provides an insightful look at the behind-the-scenes dynamics of Westminster. With a mix of gossip and opinion, it immerses readers in the political landscape, making it an engaging read for those interested in the workings of government. The book's focus on local representatives adds a personal touch, enhancing the understanding of their roles. Overall, a captivating read that sheds light on the intriguing world of politics.
mejor abogado de accidentes de moto

martin03481 said...

The proposal to allow certain prisoners to vote in general elections raises questions about their rights and privileges. This issue is likely to be a topic of debate among policymakers, lawmakers, and the public. Advocates argue that allowing prisoners to vote can help them reintegrate into society and encourage responsibility. However, the proposal is likely to be divisive, with some supporting it as a way to uphold human rights, while others may oppose it. Comparing policies from different countries can provide insights into the potential impacts of this change. Practical implementation could be challenging, especially for those serving longer sentences or in high-security facilities Abogado de Accidente de Motocicleta Virginia Beach

romanr03481 said...

The issue of allowing prisoners to vote is a contentious one, involving balancing punishment with citizenship rights. Supporters argue that it could promote rehabilitation and reintegration into society, encouraging civic participation and responsibility. Opponents argue that certain rights should be forfeited as punishment for serious crimes, causing distress and undermining the sense of justice. There are concerns about the message it sends to victims and the impact on public perception of justice. The decision to allow or deny voting rights involves a complex debate involving moral, ethical, and legal considerations. Supporters argue that it could encourage responsibility and civic engagement, potentially aiding rehabilitation and reintegration into society upon release. Others argue that it could be perceived as insensitive or disrespectful to victims of crime, potentially causing distress or undermining the sense of justice. The debate involves intricate ethical, moral, and legal aspects, with differing approaches from various countries leading to a spectrum of policies globally. Finding a solution that balances prisoners' rights, societal values, and the integrity of the justice system remains a challenging endeavor. abogado flsa

cicilla said...

Constant preparedness is one essential habit. A premier defence lawyer in Fairfax, VA understands the need of carefully reading case law, analyzing the available evidence, and foreseeing the arguments of those who may oppose them. They can skillfully negotiate the complexities of the legal system and put up a strong defence on behalf of their clients by carefully planning for every facet of a case.Abogado Defensa Criminal en Fairfax VA

Notice of Appearance Divorce New York said...

A Notice of Appearance Divorce New York divorce case is a legal document filed by a party or their attorney to officially enter their appearance in the court proceedings.

Rubyrise said...

Voter fraud is a serious threat to elections and democratic principles, as it involves illegally casting votes or manipulating election results through fraudulent means. It undermines the principle of "one person, one vote" and erodes public trust in the electoral system. Detection and prevention measures include voter registration verification, voter ID requirements, ballot tracking systems, and post-election audits. Advancements in technology, such as electronic voting systems and blockchain technology, can enhance election security but must be rigorously tested. Legal consequences for perpetrators include fines, imprisonment, and disenfranchisement. Public awareness about fair elections and fraud is crucial for safeguarding democratic values Fairfax Criminal Defense Attorney.

Post a Comment