Thursday, 19 January 2012

Boom and Bust - the definitive explanation

At the Press Gallery Lunch earlier The Guardian’s Michael White and Ed Balls had a conversation about the claim that Labour had abolished Boom and Bust, and it led to the most, shall we say, meticulous explanation of it that I have heard. It follows here…

Michael White: Whenever Gordon Brown said, as he so often did, ‘no more boom and bust’, some of us GCSE economists flinched because we knew that couldn’t possibly be true. We thought it couldn’t be right. What did you think?

Ed Balls: I think, economist or not, the power of retrospection is a great power.

MW: No. That’s the chairman’s cheap joke, come on, what did you think at the time?

EB: Since 2008 there have been many people who have written columns that said in retrospect that phrase about ‘boom and bust’ shouldn’t have been used. But I certainly used the boom and bust phrase as did other politicians in the previous 15 years. Go back to the first time it was used, was in the Labour party economic policy submission to Labour party conference of 1993. I wrote the words, and it was basically pointing out how Conservative politicians of the previous ten years, particularly Nigel Lawson, in their attempt to play politics with interest rates and the currency had ended up with self-inflicted boom and bust ups and downs, and the solution to that boom and bust political interference was an independent central bank, which was our argument. It was never an argument which was, ‘we could abolish the economic cycle’. It was an argument that we could through bank independence prevent the self inflicted political mistakes of the political era.
Did, as the years go on and Gordon Brown made more and more budget speeches, did he sometimes give the impression that stability might have been cemented into the British economic reality and psyche….perhaps. And perhaps in retrospect that was a rhetorical error.

It is only a “rhetorical error” rather than an “error”, Balls explained, because the fact that Labour used the phrase was not a reflection of an irresponsible fiscal policy executed by the party, as claimed by the Tories. The country’s economic situation going into 2008 was sound, said Balls.

So summed up, the boom and bust thing was just a phrase that Gordon Brown got a bit carried away with. I’ll say he did.


Oldrightie said...

They sometimes even enjoy these ridiculous fibs. So secure in their bubble, reality is not an issue. It might be when the piano wire is coiled waiting and only then.

Anonymous said...

It's a bit of a circular arguement isn't it - we weren't wrong on the economy, so we we'ren't really wrong on boom and bust. self justification if you get my meaning.

john in cheshire said...

In more civilised times, someone would have shoved a red hot poker up Mr Balls' arse.

livescore said...

Gorgeous dress and lovely fabric choice! Don't be sad about sbo moving to London, think of all the lovely vintage social events you ผลบอลสด can go to. Also London has great fabric shops!

farmland investing said...

All this shows is how much the political elite is completely separated and divorced from the common man. All I know is Brown was spending like a madman at the height of the economic cycle, with deficits of 3pc plus, when he should have undertaking a countercyclical policy of running surpluses and putting money aside for a rainy day.

livescore said...

"Gorgeous dress and lovely fabric choice! Don't be sad about ผลบอล moving to London, think of all the lovely vintage social events you ผลบอลสด can go to. Also London has great fabric shops!

Geek squad said...

It is just know like spending like a mad person in politics or cycle with all the lovely vintage and works in social event just like useble services you are searching for services so no need to worry because geek squad is a service that provided all the services Geek squad tech support helps you to make your life happy

Post a Comment