The PM's spokesman was quick to side-step the mine that is Tony McNulty's expense claim at a briefing just now.
He said the PM had confidence in McNulty's ability as a minister.
But he added that expenses were not an issue that relates to Tony McNulty's Government roles.
They were a matter for Parliament, he said, and needed to be dealt with by the House.
When pressed on whether he had "an opinion" the same response came.
I didn't expect anything less, but it's enough to make your blood boil.
Monday 23 March 2009
Brown: Expenses are a matter for Parliament
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
One would have thought, Mr Dog, that whether McNutter was a man of integrity and honesty was a matter that related directly to his Ministerial role, and indeed to his position as an MP. This, one would have thought, would be a matter of extreme concern to our Holder of the Moral Compass.
Has the Compass been mislaid, or is it simply that the one-eyed moron is holding it upside down?
He said the PM had confidence in McNulty's ability as a minister.
Another piece of delusion. Mad, quite mad. Just imagine if this were a Tory or LibDem.
It seems to me that McNutter's expenses, or indeed any MP's expenses are a matter for the taxpayer.
Of course, I could be wrong!
I thought he was the leader of the Labour Party, not just the PM in Govt.
Your blogs are really good and interesting. It is very great and informative. When pressed on whether he had "an opinion" the same response came virginia bankruptcy means test. I got a lots of useful information in your blog. Keeps sharing more useful blogs..
Post a Comment