Friday 5 June 2009

Missed motorway call led to false accusation

It seems Number 10 may have held a grudge against Paul Farrelly – the MP falsely outed as a plotter against Gordon Brown – from last year.

Farrelly told Lobbydog that before last week the only time the PM had called him was just before the vote on 42 days.

Actually that’s not quite right – the PM doesn’t call anyone. A lackey calls and tells you the PM is on the line and requires a conversation.

Anyway, at that point Brown asked for Farrelly’s support and the MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme told him where to go – explaining the 42 days measure was not only wrong but a political mistake.

The next time Number 10 tried to contact him was a couple of days ago, but he couldn’t take the call as he was driving up the motorway.

He phoned back later and left a message and then, while campaigning for the elections missed another call.

Shortly after that his name was fed to the Guardian as one of the conspirators behind the cyber-plot.

Sounds like Chief Whip Nick Brown thought he was in guilty hiding, when actually the MP – who said he’d never even seen any rebel e-mail – was trying to convince people to support the party in Staffs.

The irony, of course, was that Farrelly was so angry at the false accusation, that he let go of restraint and actually did call for the PM to step down.


motorcycle accident attorney near me said...

Missed calls and false charges on the highway—dive into the twists and turns of this captivating narrative with us."Thank you for sharing your knowledge! Keep up the good job! Continue to spread the word. Please take a peek at my website.

Cameron said...

estate planning taxes lawyer
The article on the missed motorway call incident is a thought-provoking and compelling story that highlights the consequences of miscommunication and the importance of accurate information in law enforcement. It underscores the need for precision and accountability in law enforcement to avoid false accusations and highlights the gravity of communication lapses. The article is particularly relevant for those interested in the intersection of technology and justice, as it highlights the real-world implications of technological errors in law enforcement. The article prompts readers to reflect on the need for reliable systems and the gravity of false accusations resulting from communication breakdowns. The article is a thought-provoking exploration of the missed motorway call incident and its aftermath, urging readers to contemplate the implications for justice and the role of technology in avoiding such errors.

Post a Comment